Sunday 27 May 2012

Where do good ideas come from?

One of our most innovative, popular thinkers takes on-in exhilarating style-one of our key questions: Where do good ideas come from?

With Where Good Ideas Come From, Steven Johnson pairs the insight of his bestselling Everything Bad Is Good for You and the dazzling erudition of The Ghost Map and The Invention of Air to address an urgent and universal question: What sparks the flash of brilliance? How does groundbreaking innovation happen? Answering in his infectious, culturally omnivorous style, using his fluency in fields from neurobiology to popular culture, Johnson provides the complete, exciting, and encouraging story of how we generate the ideas that push our careers, our lives, our society, and our culture forward.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NugRZGDbPFU

Global Witness Submission to International Development on Tax and Development

Despite tens of billions of dollars generated by oil revenues, approximately 70 per cent of Angolans and 80 per cent of Nigerians live on less than two US dollars a day. The life expectancy in Angola is 50 and 53 years for men and women respectively, and 52 and 53 years in Nigeria – both amongst the lowest in the world.

Nigeria is a significant recipient of DfID assistance with a present portfolio of 27 projects with a commitment value of £860 million (including past expenditure). If this money is to be well spent at a time of diminishing domestic budgets in the UK, DfID must therefore do the upmost to ensure the Nigerian government is able to generate domestic revenues and that these funds do not get misappropriated.

To improve the reliability of public reporting of revenues and to ensure that companies disclose revenues in all countries of operation, it is imperative that robust laws in the US and Europe are adopted to require companies to disclose the payments made to governments in all countries where they operate on a country-by country and project-by-project basis.
http://www.globalwitness.org/sites/default/files/library/Global%20Witness%20submission%20to%20IDC%20Tax%20Inquiry%206%20Feb%202012.pdf

Videonews: Amnesty International Report 2012

The Threat of Cyberwar Is Not Hype

by  |  on May 25th, 2012 
In the March/April 2012 issue of Foreign Policy Magazine, Thomas Rid wrote an article called Think Again:  Cyberwar.  The subtitle was:  Don’t Fear the Digital Bogeyman Virtual Conflict is Still More Hype Than Reality.  He states his premise up front:
“Time for a reality check:  Cyberwar is still more hype than hazard. Consider the definition of an act of war: It has to be potentially violent, it has to be purposeful, and it has to be political. The cyberattacks we’ve seen so far, from Estonia to the Stuxnet virus, simply don’t meet these criteria.”
He then goes on to build some powerful arguments to support his case.  I thought the article was well written but he missed a couple of key points.  First his definition of war is outdated and doesn’t take in the new reality of how wars are and will be conducted in the 21st Century.  In terms of warfare, Cyber is many things.  It’s a weapon and it’s a domain that military forces operate in.  Cyber is also the backbone of how our highly technical military operates.  Cyber attacks have the potential to cripple military operations.  A generation used to computers doing a lot of work that was done manually in past conflicts would be forced to learn new ways of doing business on the fly and possibly in the midst of simultaneously conducting combat operations.
Here I’m talking about a potential situation of  Country A launching a land based cruise missile at a US ship as it transits through a strait.  Now computers provide tracking information that helps you know its location as it heads towards your ship so you can direct weapons to shoot it down.  If the country launching the missile used a cyber weapon to shut down the ships computers before launching the missile, these calculations would have to be done manually.
Another related point is that cyber can be used as a stand alone weapon or as one of many (bombs, missiles, etc) used in a war plan.  As stated by former Deputy Secretary of Defense William Linn III in a September 2011 article in Foreign Affairs magazine:  “In the twenty-first century, bits and bytes are as threatening as bullets and bombs.”
It’s not just the definition of war but many of the laws and regulations addressing cyber are either outdated or simply don’t exist in a form needed to adequately address cyber issues.  Nations, to include our own, are still debating what constitutes a cyber attack and what constitutes a cyber act of war and what constitutes a cyber crime.
On May 17 during the U.S.Counter Terror Expo, one of the panels was titled Hacktivism:  A New Terror Vector?  The session was opened referencing a “statement from FBI Director Mueller that the network disruptions and intrusions common to groups like Anonymous may soon be classified as terrorism.” One of the panel participants, Melissa Hathaway, who led the 60 day White House Cyber Policy Review, discussed how “how the Internet was leveraged by terrorists both in the planning and operational stages of the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Cyber enables non-state actors to shorten their decision cycle, giving them a distinct advantage over law enforcement officials hamstrung by obsolete policies and technology, according to Ms. Hathaway”.
As to whether or not the cyberwar threat is mostly hype, I don’t believe it is.  The challenge in writing about the topic gets me to the second criticism I have of the Thomas Rid article.  Unless you’re working for those portions of the government evaluating the cyber threat you simply don’t have access to all of the information needed to determine what is and is not going on with cyber threats.  A lot of the details remain classified or in the case of many companies remain unreported.  This is an issue currently being worked on in the various proposed Congressional legislation.
Case in point, on 22 May during a meeting of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee it was reported that al Qaeda had released a video calling for an “Electronic Jihad”.   A report on the Committee’s web site stated: 
The video explicitly calls for cyber attacks against the networks of both government and life-sustaining critical infrastructure, including the electric grid, and compares vulnerabilities inU.S. critical cyber networks to the vulnerabilities in our aviation system prior to 9/11.
“This is the clearest evidence we’ve seen that Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups want to attack the cyber systems of our critical infrastructure,” Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., said.”
What jumped out at me was the FBI obtained the video a year ago through open sources.  The information may be unclassified but I suspect the various government agencies have lots of classified information from various sources supporting this and other threats of cyberwar.  This brings me to the main reason I sat down today to write this blog.  On May 14th, I participated in a Department of Defense Bloggers Roundtable With Eric Rosenbach, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Cyber Policy, and Richard Hale, Deputy Chief Information Officer for Cybersecurity Via Teleconference Subject: The Pentagon’s Recent Initiatives to Improve Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Network Defenses and Allow DIB Companies and the Government to Reduce Damage to Critical Programs When Defense Information is Compromised.
I’ll provide the details of the Bloggers Roundtable this weekend but would like to conclude with a little more background.  In the 2011 Foreign Affairs article, Mr. Linn discussed the Department of Defenses strategy for cyberwar.
“To meet this growing threat, the Department of Defense developed a strategy for operating in cyberspace that has five pillars: treating cyberspace as an operational domain, like land, air, sea, and outer space; employing active defenses to stop malicious code before it affects our networks; protecting commercial networks that operate the critical infrastructure that our military relies upon; joining with allies to mount a collective cyberdefense; and mobilizing industry to redesign network technology with security in mind. Extending advanced cyberdefenses to critical infrastructure is one of the strategy’s most crucial objectives. Cyber intrusions have been directed at nearly every sector of our economy infrastructure…Current countermeasures have not stopped this outflow of sensitive information. In response, the Department of Defense, in partnership with DHS and a handful of defense companies, has established a pilot program to provide more robust protection for private networks. In the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) Cyber Pilot, the government shares classified threat intelligence with private companies or their Internet service providers. The intelligence is then integrated into companies’ own network defenses. Because it builds off commercial technologies, the DIB Cyber Pilot provides additional protection for only an incremental increase in cost.
Moreover, the project does not entailU.S.government monitoring, intercepting, or storing of private sector communications, and it is voluntary for all participants.”
Thank I’ll end here.  As always, my views are my own.

Why We Need Laws to Protect What's Left of Our Forests

International efforts to protect forests and the people that live in them have failed so badly that just 20 per cent of forest remains untouched by commercial activity. It is really, really crucial that we find a global system that looks after what remains of the world's lungs.

The question of how best to do this lies at the heart of a recent public debate between Global Witness and WWF over the credibility of the latter's flagship timber sustainability scheme, the Global Forest and Trade Network (GFTN).
Last July, a Global Witness investigation raised important concerns that the GFTN was not delivering on its promise to protect people and the environment, because of a combination of weak membership standards, lax monitoring of members and poor transparency. Some of the worst examples showed a UK timber merchant dealing in illegal timber, a Malaysia logging company clearing orang-utan habitat inside WWF's own "Heart of Borneo" project, and a Swiss-German timber trader whose Congolese subsidiary had links to human rights abuses - all carried out while members of the WWF scheme. WWF initially denied these claims but has now largely accepted them.

These were damning findings which got a lot of attention, and WWF hastened an independent review which has just been made public. It accepts Global Witness claims, acknowledges room for improvement on some of the worst excesses and promises to do a better job of monitoring companies on its books.
These are all positive and welcome steps, which will make a difference in the particular instances cited. But they don't address - and WWF has consistently brushed over - the fundamental question we are posing, about whether the approach they are endorsing will actually do the job of saving forests.

Our main criticism is not that WWF has got too close to companies and failed to hold them to account, although that is true. It is that even if these companieswere playing by the scheme's rules, the system it endorses is fundamentally wrong.
The logic WWF works on is that responsible logging will keep some form of forest standing. But a weighty body of evidence now shows this approach actually makes deforestation in these and surrounding areas more likely over time.
The damage done by incentivising loggers to go deeper into primary forest is hard to overstate. That's why we say operations have to be restricted to areas already subjected to logging, and kept sustainable.
To make this happen, the solutions need to be legally binding, and tackle the perverse incentives to continue logging in new forest frontiers. This is where Global Witness is operating - in tropical forested countries with fragile governments, widespread corruption and rampant illegal logging - working with local civil society to tighten the processes and laws governing forests and monitor the implementation of those laws.
Given the global nature of the industry, we need solutions at this level too, and we have seen some progress. New legislation in Europe banning the import of illegal timber is a welcome complement to tough US laws. But other major markets need to also follow suit including Japan, India and China. And as these laws get implemented, they too need strengthening to not just reject blatant illegal timber, but also make genuine sustainability a condition of entry. This would help purge timber from industrial operations in intact forests from our supply chains.
There are also easier wins in the offing. Take for example the recent legislation in the United States which prohibits any US tax dollars supporting industrial logging in primary tropical forests. Similar legislation in other major countries would send a strong signal to timber markets and other schemes that such operations are no longer acceptable.
The big engine driving deforestation is ultimately consumption. Demand for food, fuel and fibre needs to be contained and made more equitable. Policy makers must face up to this.
But our aim in investigating GFTN was to show that the model at the supply end is broken - the status quo is destroying our forests at breakneck speed, and weak voluntary schemes rubberstamp it. So we need to go back to basics and come up with credible alternatives, armed with legal sanctions, before it's too late. WWF is one of the most iconic names in environmentalism - it must play a key part in driving forward any solution. We hope they and others will engage with us to seek real long term solutions.

Uganda has got a life president but some people still discuss M7′s successor

Uganda has got a life president but some people still discuss M7′s successor

John Patrick Amama Mbabazi
John Patrick Amama Mbabazi
Folks,
I think it is wrong for some people to measure Prime Minister, Amama Mbabazi’s popularity in Uganda on the basis of his winning in one constituency or ‘winning’(‘rigging’) the post of NRM Secretary General. Unless a national poll is run, we cannot know for sure how popular Mbabazi is nationally.

I think Mbabazi is nothing without president Museveni and my assumption still remains:’ he will fall with the big man”. There is too much at stake here to promote Mbabazi as the next president of Uganda. He is undoubtedly an intelligent and serious man but I still cannot imagine Mbabazi as my president, but you never know. Uganda is one country where anything is possible.

Nonetheless, I don’t know what makes some people think that president Museveni is looking for a successor.   There are some NRM guys usually deployed to confuse Ugandans every time they are fed up with the Museveni or some stuff in the government. It was especially NRM journalists and sympathisers that wrote a lot of articles in the media and visited FM stations telling us that there is a succession war in NRM before the 2001 and 2006 elections. Some Ugandans bought it, and it kind of deflated the pressure the church leaders and Makerere students had galvanised against president Museveni. It is all a game to some of them and it is a bad game in my books. They cannot play this game indefinitely.
President Museveni himself has not helped the situation at all as he keeps enjoying this game endlessly, and now some of NRM supporters are at it again. In his 1996 election manifesto Museveni wanted the point inserted that he would only stand for one further term but how many terms has he had since then?

Museveni has never had any intentions to hand over the presidency ever since he came to power. But he knows how to calm down nerves down by telling those close to him every time there is an election- that he’s standing for the last time. He did so in 1996, as I earlier stated. He again did so in 2001 elections. In his 2001 election manifesto, Museveni declared several times that he would contest ‘for a last presidential term’ and also put ‘in place mechanisms for an orderly succession’.

In 2008, Museveni is reported in the press saying ‘I am not going anywhere’. He stopped pretending since 2006. In the same year (2008), he was quoted as saying when asked about stepping down: ‘It’s me who hunted and after killing the animal, they want me to go, where should I go?’

During the 2006 presidential campaign, he had this to say: ‘You don’t just tell the freedom fighter to go like you are chasing a chicken thief out of the house.’

While addressing a meeting of NRM MPs from the western region, Museveni declared firmly ‘If you shy away from me, I will also shy away from you’.

In June 2007, at a major retreat for NRM MPs, a number of MPs wanted to discuss who should be the presidential candidate in 2011. But at Museveni’s insistence debate on the succession question was removed from the agenda.
So, we should not waste any more time on Museveni’s succession project because we have got a life president, and we should come to terms with it.

Jesus, if Museveni is to go, we don’t need people who have been helping him to stay in power indefinitely as if Uganda only belongs to them, and Mr. Mbabazi is certainly one of those that have helped to cement this dictatorship. Why would anyone feel that Mbabazi will do anything different from what his boss has been doing?

By the way, those who think that Mr. Mbabazi can only come in as a stopper waiting for ‘’president’’ Muhoozi to take over, are day dreaming. The moment Museveni helps  Mbabazi to become the president of Uganda, the former will not be going anywhere soon. Who wants to stay in paradise for a short time in Africa unless if one is a prophet, and I think even president Museveni must be thinking about it. Even loyal servants sometimes stab their bosses in the back.

Mbabazi’s popularity VS Besigye’s

Most of the NRM guys despise Besigye but they like using him as the standard to compare other candidates at local level. Which constituency did Museveni win before he became the president of Uganda?  The whole intention of all this is to portray Besigye as a very unpopular man who should have become a MP before he stood for presidency or who ‘jumped the queue’ (to quote from the ‘popular’ Mbabazi). The Norbert Mao supporters tried the same nasty approach in the 2011 presidential campaigns to portray their candidate as already more popular than Besigye because he had been in parliament for ages( 9 years to be exact), but the later still did better than the former.

Besigye may be quitting the FDC presidency but he is not quitting politics, I believe. So, we are likely to see him around for a long time unless the man upstairs calls him. He has done well nationally since he started standing against Museveni in 2001. Museveni’s numbers, on the other hand, have been declining (if we disregard the ‘useless’ 2011 elections). Museveni’s numbers had declined from 5.1 million in 2001 to 4 million in 2006 while those for Besigye had increased from 2 million to 2.4 million over the same period.

There is a belief in some circles in Kampala that Museveni was forced to change the term limits because of Besigye’s popularity in 2001 elections. There is also some unsubstantiated information that Besigye won both the 2001 and 2006 elections despite the results that were officially pronounced by the Electoral Commission.

The way Besigye performed in 2001 elections was an eye opener for Museveni such that he saw no NRM candidate capable of beating him in 2006 other than himself. Yes, ‘popular’ Mbabazi was in government but he wasn’t seen by his boss as more popular than Besigye. Besigye campaigned in 2001 for only 5 months and he did unbelievably well despite the violence and an array of electoral irregularities impeding a fair contest. As such, term limits on presidency were removed in 2005 to prepare for a Museveni presidency in 2006.

In 2006, the judges were intimidated not to order for a re-run. These are now facts and on record. So, how can anybody compare Mbabazi to Besigye in terms of popularity?  By the way, I have got a feeling that Besigye will come back as a presidential candidate in future at some point. It is a just a feeling but worth noting if you are an NRM supporter. And if he stands, Museveni will again have to convince the NRM guys that he is the only one that can take him on. Can you really see Ugandans voting for Mbabazi and discard the man who has been bracing the teargas regularly to change what has gone wrong?

Besigye may have a chance with a ‘popular’ Mbabazi( NRM). You see, it is now a fact that rigging has been part of Uganda elections since 1980s but sometimes it may difficult  to rig and later win an election with a weaker candidate. That’s why NRM has kept Museveni or rather he has kept himself running against Besigye for a long time, because he does not see so many options in his own party.

For instance, in Zambia, Keneth Kaunda was controlling the electoral system  for decades ,as president Museveni has been doing the same in Uganda, but he was eventually defeated because he could not inflate the numbers as much as he wanted in his last election. Similarly, despite his weaknesses, Museveni has got some popularity in rural areas and there are pockets of people in urban centres that still love him, but i cannot see any reason why anybody would want to vote for Mbabazi, for what really?

I may be wrong about this, and I don’t mean to sound like I’m undermining Honorable Mbabazi’s authority or power- because I know he is extremely powerful and all that, but I don’t see him standing a chance, moreover, against a giant Besigye. Phewwwwwwwwwwwww! He can only win if Kiggundu does it like he did it in 2011 and came up with surprising results.

So, Besigye would have a chance to get into that statehouse if NRM presents Mbabazi as their leader. But popularity never takes anybody to statehouse in Uganda. Otherwise, Besigye would be president by now.
I don’t hate Mbabazi at all, and I would probably learn a lot from him if I was working for him because he is an elder with experience. But NRM should also reflect on this:’ would he the best person NRM can offer to replace president Museveni?’ If he is, then NRM does not care what Ugandans think about them and can do anything they want, which begs another question of why we are wasting money on presidential elections.

One of president Museveni’s aides, Aisha Kabanda, wrote: ‘Mbabazi is definitely an outstanding character……..’

Our nation is facing crises on several fronts at the moment, the resolution of which will require the steady hand of a statesman in possession of outstanding character, but I don’t think Mr. Mbabazi is that person. What can he really do which would be any different from president Museveni’s yet he is his close partner in crime? As the Baganda say: ‘Mbulilra gwoyita naye…..’, or ‘birds of the same feathers flock together’.

Look, some Ugandans can say anything they want to support such a character but Mr. Mbabazi’s image is so tainted. Do I need to remind them that in 2008 the parliamentary Committee on Commissions, Statutory Authorities and State Enterprises probed a controversial UShs.11 billion ($5.5 million) land transaction between the NSSF, and Amama Mbabazi.  The majority report found him guilty of conflict of interest and influence peddling in the NSSF land deal, recommending sanctions against him and other involved officials. President Museveni had to call a special cabinet meeting with intentions of saving Mbabazi from imminent parliamentary censure. NRM MPs were also later summoned in statehouse and given orders on how they were gonna vote on this issue.

As a man with an otherwise’ good’ character and impressive history of employment (as Aisha Kabanda put it), it is little wonder it took the president to persuade the MPs and his cabinet to save his job, right?

Aisha also asked:’ is he worse than any other President Uganda has ever had? ‘. Neither She nor anyone knows what Mbabazi will be like because he is not a president yet. So, I don’t know why she was comparing him to past presidents we have ever had. May be, she meant president Museveni, right?

Anyway, I don’t know why we are even wasting time on him because president Museveni is not going anywhere soon, I guess. That is why I think we are wasting time discussing Museveni succession project- especially Mr. Mbabazi. There is no succession or successor any time soon. Mbabazi will retire with Museveni unless the constitution is changed in 2021 to allow the 70 something old to stand for presidency.

Abbey Semuwemba

Monday 21 May 2012

Cheap 'slavery' help from Uganda to Iraq

Slaves to the private military in Iraq

Cheap help from Uganda

Private security firms won lucrative contracts to supply support staff and security guards to back up US forces in Iraq. They recruited Ugandans and pushed them to the limit, on low pay and no benefits
by Alain Vicky
 
“I realised immediately that I’d just made the worst mistake in my life. But it was too late. I’d signed up for a year. I had to take it like a man,” said Bernard (1), a young Ugandan who worked for an American private military company (PMC) operating in Iraq. He was part of the “invisible army” (2) recruited by the US to support its war effort. Bernard returned to Uganda last year. He is ill, but has been denied the welfare and healthcare benefits promised in his contract.
White recruits — from the US, Israel, South Africa, the UK, France and Serbia — hired by PMCs that have won contracts with the Pentagon (worth $120bn since 2003) have received substantial pay, often more than $10,000 a month; “third country nationals” (TCNs) like Bernard have been treated badly and their rights as employees have been abused. Some, sent home after being wounded, get no help from their former employers.
In June 2008, when the US began its withdrawal from Iraq, there were 70,167 TCNs to 153,300 regular US military personnel; in late 2010 there were still 40,776 TCNs to 47,305 regulars. TCNs (men and women) were recruited in the countries of the South to work on the 25 US military bases in Iraq, including Camp Liberty, an “American small town” built near Baghdad, which at its peak had a population of over 100,000. They made up 59% of the “basic needs” workforce, handling catering, cleaning, electrical and building maintenance, fast food, and even beauty services for female military personnel.

Some, especially African recruits, were assigned to security duties, paired up with regular troops: 15% of the static security personnel (guarding base entrances and perimeters) hired by the PMCs on behalf of the Pentagon were Sub-Saharans. Among these low-cost guards, Ugandans were a majority, numbering maybe 20,000. They were sometimes used to keep their colleagues in line: in May 2010 they quelled a riot at Camp Liberty by a thousand TCNs from the Indian subcontinent.

The high ratio of Ugandans was due to the political situation in central Africa in the early 2000s. In western Uganda the war in the Great Lakes region was officially over. In northern Uganda the Lord’s Resistance Army rebels had been brought under control. In neighbouring Sudan the civil war was over, opening up the way to independence for the south (3). More than 60,000 Ugandan troops were demobilised; Iraq seemed like an opportunity. The Ugandan government, a key ally of the US in central Africa, was one of the few to support the Bush administration when the Iraq war began in 2003. US and Ugandan armed forces have collaborated since the mid-1980s. Ugandan journalist and blogger Angelo Izama (4) told me that in 2005 the US needed more paramilitary security — “They were looking for reliable labour from English-speaking countries, veteran labour” — and turned to Uganda.

Veterans can be trouble

Norbert Mao (5), an unsuccessful candidate for Uganda’s Democratic Party in the 2011 presidential elections, believes there was another motive for sending Ugandans to Iraq: “When veterans … are idle, they can be a source of problems. So Iraq was a way of exporting idle veterans. The government saw it as a way of mopping up.” Companies founded by former US military personnel linked up with others founded by former high-ranking officers of the Ugandan armed forces.
Kellen Kayonga — sister-in-law of one of the best-known security company directors in Uganda, General Salim Saleh, who is a younger brother of President Yoweri Museveni — founded Askar Security Services. Since 2005 Askar has recruited manpower on behalf of Special Operations Consulting (SOC, now renamed SOC-SMG), a Nevada-based company founded by two former US officers. Askar’s main competition in Uganda — the Pakistani company Dreshak International — opened a branch in Kampala the same year and began working for another US-based PMC operating in Iraq, EODT. (Since 2006 a dozen more “conflict entrepreneurs” have set up operations in Uganda.) In poorer areas of Kampala, Iraq was seen as the new frontier for kyeyos (migrant workers). A former combatant who signed up with these firms could earn up to $1,300 a month, well above the average in Kampala’s flourishing security and civilian protection sector.

In 2007 more than 3,000 Ugandans were deployed to Iraq. In 2008 they numbered 10,000. Most were employed by American PMCs such as Torres, DynCorp, Triple Canopy, Sabre and SOC. “Then,” said Izama, “it degenerated into a price war.” Pay started to fall. “It was an unregulated sector here, so if you had political connections you could muscle your way [into] a business like this. But the essential reason for the under-pricing was that … recruitment was [no longer aimed just at] veterans. Anyone could go [to Iraq].” Another pretext for cutting pay was competition from workers recruited in Kenya and Sierra Leone. Uganda’s labour ministry failed to intervene. In 2009 average pay fell below $700. Meanwhile, Sabre was getting $1,700 from the US government for every Ugandan guard recruited. Askar was paid $420,000 dollars for sending 264 guards to Iraq for Beowulf International, another PMC.

The Ugandan press uncovered the first cases of exploitation of kyeyos in 2008, but the government merely strengthened the position of the more powerful companies — and those closest to Museveni — by a limited clean-up operation.
“Going to Iraq is like a drowning man grasping at a crocodile. He thinks it will save him from drowning,” said Mao. In autumn 2011 kyeyo pay in Iraq fell to $400 a month for a 12-hour day and a six-day week. All the men and women I met had been sent to Iraq in or after December 2009. Most were originally from the countryside and had previously worked for security companies in Kampala. Two had studied at Makerere University. They found it difficult to talk about what they had been through, and their testimonies were interrupted by long embarrassed silences.

Start of the journey

Their story began at Dreshak’s Uganda branch in central Kampala. For two months, they underwent military training designed to test their aptitudes. During this time they were not paid; the company only provided meals. At the end of training, Dreshak asked them to go home and wait to be recalled. Some waited for three months. The day they were finally summoned was the point of no return. A former recruit said: “We had no other option. All the time we were waiting, we were spending money without earning any. Some of us had even sold all our belongings, except for the chairs. We had no option but to sign. Under those conditions, they could make us accept anything.” The contract they were shown at this point was 11 pages long. They were given 15 minutes to read it and initial each page.

That day, the recruits also discovered the name of their final employer — SOC. Bernard remembered hesitating before signing: “I was working for the internet department of a company and when I saw the pay SOC were offering I really wondered if it was worth it. It was only 300,000 shillings (around $117) more a month.” On the insistence of his friends, and after a number of phone calls from an “American manager”, Bernard eventually decided to go. Two days and a seven-hour flight later, he landed in Baghdad.

Three-quarters of an hour by helicopter from Baghdad, the Al-Assad airbase was a little piece of America in the middle of Iraq. The SOC unit the kyeyos were joining was made up of around 800 Ugandans, commanded by a few Ugandan expatriates who took their orders from US superiors. After another month of training, again unpaid, the new recruits discovered Iraq’s dust storms and freezing winter nights. They had to wait several months for the equipment SOC had promised. The gloves they needed for the cold nights only arrived at the end of the winter. Some had to buy their own dust masks at the PX (base store), $25 out of their meagre pay. Even the military equipment they were issued with was not regulation: AK 47, cartridge belt, helmet and bulletproof vest, all second-hand — the kyeyos joked that they were Chinese. They carried a heavier load, but were less well protected than the regulars from snipers, who could hit the mark at a range of several hundred metres: among their duties was checking the 500 vehicles entering the compound each day.

Termination of services

As the weeks went by, they discovered that the enemy could also be within their own unit: their bosses worked them far harder than was allowed in their contract, pushing them beyond the limits of their physical endurance. Some worked 15 hours a day. Holidays (unpaid) in Uganda, which they had been promised after 12 months on tour, were repeatedly postponed. A number of former TCNs told me they had lived under constant pressure, terrified, even at night: “You couldn’t say anything. They had the power of life and death over you; they could send you wherever they liked — to the most dangerous posts if they thought you were a troublemaker.”

SOC had the perfect way to control recalcitrant TCNs: terminating their contract without severance pay and shipping them home. A contract I obtained from SOC lists 21 kinds of unacceptable behaviour that will result in disciplinary measures. In this document, “termination of services” is the last resort after a series of other measures, ranging from a written warning to suspension for five days without pay. On the ground, the reality was far harsher. In the contract, SOC reserves the right to “take other disciplinary action on other violations of orders or policy that may not be listed”. A former recruit told me: “You would get a warning letter ... because you hadn’t been wearing your helmet off duty, and they would stop your pay for two weeks. And you still had to work. We were scared of losing our jobs, so we kept our mouths shut.” The code of conduct section of the contract requires the employee to “uphold the ideals of the Republic of Uganda” and “refrain from tarnishing the image of Uganda abroad”.

The SOC contract also provides for “termination of services” if the employee is unable to work, owing to illness, injury or accident, for 30 days or more in any four-month period. Bernard was privileged because he worked in SOC’s offices, but saw dozens of his countrymen fired for arbitrarily assessed health problems. “During the long dust storms,” he said, “they used to develop ear infections or sinusitis. They had eye problems, even lung problems. When they asked for treatment, all they got was aspirin. And when they came back because it didn’t cure them, they would be fired. SOC just didn’t want to have to pay any kind of medical expenses. As they used to tell us, they were there to make money.”

Last summer Bernard began to have pains in his knee. An SOC “doctor” gave him a corticosteroid, which made things worse. The skin on his face began to peel: “I saw another doctor, or so-called doctor, who started looking for information on Google!” A few weeks later, Bernard’s contract was terminated. He spent 20 days in transit, left to his own devices at a camp in Baghdad, before finally managing to get on a chartered flight to Kampala. That was last autumn, just 10 days before I met him. Bernard had not yet been to see his mother, fearing she would be upset at the state of his face. But he had been to see the family doctor: “I told him what they had prescribed. He said it was the worst mistake they could have made and told me I would have to fight to regain my health. He made me a list of drugs. It’s the biggest expense I’ve ever faced: over 300,000 shillings. I desperately need money to continue the treatment, but Dreshak don’t want to know. And I’ve heard nothing from SOC.”

Like all foreign nationals working for PMCs under contract to the Pentagon, sick or wounded Ugandans repatriated from Iraq are, in principle, covered by the Defense Base Act, which guarantees that their employer’s insurer will reimburse their medical expenses. It also provides for disability pay for the most unfortunate. “But, all too often, the Ugandans do not receive the medical care and disability that they are supposed to,” American lawyer Tara K Coughlin told me.

Taking on the insurers

A couple of years ago, Coughlin, a member of a Christian organisation supporting US soldiers in Iraq, discovered that Ugandans were working alongside “our boys”. Using her own money — her clients can’t afford the medical examinations they need to put together a dossier to support their claim — she has taken the cases of 30 former kyeyos who came back sick or injured from Iraq to the US Department of Labour. They include Ugandan women suffering from musculoskeletal problems caused by excessively heavy equipment. Coughlin has filed complaints against EODT, SOC, Sabre and Triple Canopy, and their insurers, including the giant American International Group (AIG). Ultimately, she stressed, it is the insurance companies that deny medical care and compensation to the Ugandans.

Coughlin has already visited Uganda twice. She has to work discreetly and delicately. First, with the help of a former kyeyo also returned from Iraq, she seeks out victims: “One problem is that many of the injured Ugandans who come home to Uganda cannot afford to live in Kampala or other large cities, so they go back to their villages without knowing how to get help [from the US legal system]. … My estimate is that there are several hundred Ugandans at least who have been wounded. And that estimate could be conservative.” Then, she has to overcome their suspicion and the embarrassment they feel in talking to a white female foreigner. Many of her clients were pressured not to report their injuries. “I had one client who was injured and his contractor boss threatened to send him home to Uganda in a ‘body bag’ if he reported his injury.” And when they received medical care in Iraq, their medical records were often confiscated by their bosses before they were allowed to return to Uganda. Coughlin and her clients have to start again from scratch. They have to work quickly too: kyeyos returning from Iraq have just 12 months to file a complaint.

Coughlin also has to fight the mighty machine the insurance companies have deployed, reaching all the way to Uganda. AIG uses investigators, such as the Maltese company Tangiers International, to contest claims. According to Coughlin, some investigators have extremely questionable ethics. Another investigative company contacted one of her clients and tried to take him to their own physician for a second opinion. Another client has been physically unable to work since he returned from Iraq — he received a mysterious call offering him a job, just to see if he would accept it. Given the scarcity of medical specialists in Uganda, Coughlin is concerned that she will one day run into a doctor who is in the pay of the insurance companies. Countering the investigators, she said, is one of the most difficult aspects of her work.
Uganda’s labour ministry estimates that the men and women sent to Iraq since 2005 should have been able to send over $90m home to their families. This is more than Uganda makes from coffee, its principal export. Having, in many cases, spent more than a year in the Middle East, the men I met had on average saved the equivalent of less than $1,300. Their pay, in Ugandan shillings, frozen in accounts at Crane Bank in Kampala until their return, has been steadily eaten away by exchange rate losses, and by inflation, which hit Uganda hard while they were away (over 40% in 2011). “Dreshak recruited us, sold us to SOC and pocketed the proceeds. What we got at the end of the day was peanuts. Basically, what we experienced was modern-day slavery.”

The Commission on Wartime Contracting’s report to the US Congress in August 2011 states that “abuses in contingency contracting undermine the United States’ reputation abroad” and takes the view that “as troop numbers decline, the number of contractors may increase, at least in the short term, for it may be many years — if ever — before the United States fully withdraws from operations in Iraq and Afghanistan” (6). The “market for force” (7) is not likely to dry up in the near future. To protect the 16,000 employees of the US embassy in Iraq, the Department of State has hired eight American PMCs, at a cost of $10bn, to recruit an army of 5,500 “contractors”. Triple Canopy will protect the diplomats while SOC will provide static security for five years, for $973m. Askar is now also operating on the Afghan market. Its director Kellen Kayonga says more kyeyos will probably be recruited. The Iraq returnees believe that, from Baghdad to Kabul, and tomorrow maybe to Mogadishu, there will always be Ugandans ready to join this “black force ... because of inflation, because of education costs, which are rising, because of the cost of food, which is soaring… It’s not that we like it, but we need to make a living!”
source: http://mondediplo.com/2012/05/05uganda

{UAH} World Happiness Report 2012

The report reflects a new worldwide demand for more attention to happiness and absence of misery as criteria for government policy. It reviews the state of happiness in the world today and shows how the new science of happiness explains personal and national variations in happiness.
The happiest countries in the world are all in Northern Europe (Denmark, Norway, Finland, Netherlands). Their average life evaluation score is 7.6 on a 0-to-10 scale. The least happy countries are all poor countries in Sub-Saharan Africa (Togo, Benin, Central African Republic, Sierra Leone) with average life evaluation scores of 3.4. But it is not just wealth that makes people happy: Political freedom, strong social networks and an absence of corruption are together more important than income in explaining well-being differences between the top and bottom countries. At the individual level, good mental and physical health, someone to count on, job security and stable families are crucial.

Edited by John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs, Earth Institute, Columbia University, 2012
http://www.earth.columbia.edu/sitefiles/file/Sachs%20Writing/2012/World%20Happiness%20Report.pdf

An Overview Of Intellectual Property Rights and International Trade

There have been extraordinary changes in intellectual property (commonly referred to as IP) law and policy over the last 20 years, many as the result of their intersection with international trade and the numerous international trade agreements brought into force during this period. The increase in cross-border exchanges of goods, services, capital and knowledge is one reason for this shift; structural changes in all economies — with knowledge emerging as society’s most important tradable economic asset — are another. Underlying this activity are changes to intellectual property rights laws and policies. http://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/no.3.pdf

World Economic Situation and Prospects 2012

Following two years of anaemic and uneven recovery from the global financial crisis, the world economy is teetering on the brink of another major downturn. Output growth has already slowed considerably during 2011, especially in the developed countries. the global crisis and the recent financial turmoil have highlighted the need for very large liquidity buffers to deal with sudden, large capital market shocks. Many developing countries have continued to accumulate vast amounts of reserves($1.1 trillion in 2011) as a form of self-protection. But doing so comes with high opportunity costs and is contributing to the problem of the global imbalances. A better pooling of reserves, regionally and internationally, could reduce such costs to individual countries and could also form a basis for more reliable emergency financing and the establishment of an international lender-of-last-resort mechanism. Broadening existing SDR arrangements could form part of such new arrangements. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wesp/wesp_current/2012wesp_prerel.pdf

 --
UAH is devoted to matters of interest to Ugandans and Africans in general. Individuals are responsible for whatever they post on this forum.Follow UAH on Twitter at:http://twitter.com/#!/UAHFORUM. Follow UAH on facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ugandans-At-HeartUAH/132196106801171.  To donate to UAH activities, click on:http://ugandansatheart.org/donate-to-uah/. Buy our products at: http://ugandansatheart.org/products-to-buy/. Also visit UAH extension at: http://jjanguonkwekule.blogspot.com/.Join UAH facebook group at: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ugandansatheart/

Wednesday 9 May 2012

Standards for change? ISO 26000 and sustainable development

This report looks at what has happened so far and what the potential could be. The paper argues that unlike some of the best-known ISO standards on other subjects, ISO 26000 does not address how to manage sustainable development issues in a systematic way. And it does not provide for independent certification of its application. This limits its appeal to many companies and makes it difficult to measure accurately its rate of adoption and impact. However, the worldwide reach of ISO and its members – the 162 National Standards Bodies – together with the commitment of key governments, including the Chinese, is likely to ensure that the standard is actively promoted.


While it is too early to measure its specific impacts, one key contribution of ISO 26000 has been to legitimise a broader definition of organisational responsibility - particularly for companies. The standard broadens the concept of organisational governance to include sustainable development and the interests of stakeholders, not just shareholders. This is important, because stakeholder empowerment is a central component of social sustainability and social justice. ISO 26000 is a standard that will have worldwide significance, and its impact should be carefully monitored.
http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/16513IIED.pdf

Great Recession and Developing Countries : Economic Impact and Growth Prospects

While globalization has been a powerful engine of economic growth over the past three decades, it has also posed new problems and challenges, especially for international economic policy coordination. In the past decade, the large and rapid increases in trade, remittances, and international financial flows across borders have been a strong incentive for economic growth, not only in East and South Asia but also in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. And rapid and sustained economic growth in several low- and middle-income economies has been steadily altering the economic weights of different regions in the world economy. 


The ten case studies in this volume illustrate the wide range of effects of, and responses to, the global crisis in low-and middle-income economies. While the case studies do not constitute a statistically representative sample of the globe, they illustrate a broad range of experiences in the wake of the crisis and give insights into both the benefits and challenges of globalization. The use of a common methodology in preparing the cases unquestionably facilitates cross-country comparisons and helps identify areas where more study is needed to increase the understanding of the current problems of, and prospects for, developing countries.
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/2539/584390PUB0ID181ession09780821385135.pdf?sequence=1

Global Cancer Facts and Figures 2012

Persons with lower socioeconomic status (SES) have disproportionately higher cancer death rates than those with higher SES, regardless of demographic factors such as race/ethnicity. For example, cancer mortality rates among both African American and non-Hispanic white men with 12 or fewer years of education are almost 3 times higher than those of college graduates for all cancers combined, and 4-5 times higher for lung cancer. Furthermore, progress in reducing cancer death rates has been slower in persons with lower SES. These disparities occur largely because persons with lower SES are at higher risk for cancer and have less favorable outcomes after diagnosis.


In addition to poverty and social discrimination, cancer occurrence in a population may also be influenced by cultural and/or inherited factors that decrease or increase risk. For example, Hispanic women have a lower risk of breast cancer probably in part because they tend to begin having children at a younger age, which decreases breast cancer risk. Individuals who maintain a primarily plant-based diet or do not use tobacco because of cultural or religious beliefs have a lower risk of many cancers. Higher rates of cancers related to infectious agents (e.g., stomach, liver, uterine cervix) in populations that include a large number of recent immigrants, such as Hispanics and Asians, may reflect a higher prevalence of infection in the country of origin. Genetic factors may also explain some differences in cancer incidence.
http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-031941.pdf

 
UAH is devoted to matters of interest to Ugandans and Africans in general. Individuals are responsible for whatever they post on this forum.Follow UAH on Twitter at:http://twitter.com/#!/UAHFORUM. Follow UAH on facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ugandans-At-HeartUAH/132196106801171. To donate to UAH activities, click on:http://ugandansatheart.org/donate-to-uah/. Buy our products at: http://ugandansatheart.org/products-to-buy/. Also visit UAH extension at: http://jjanguonkwekule.blogspot.com/.Join UAH facebook group at: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ugandansatheart

The 2011 Humanitarian Accountability Report

The HAP membership and its Secretariat have released the annual review of the "year that was", the 2011 Humanitarian Accountability Report. This year's report was published in conjunction with the 2011 HAP Secretariat Report.

The Humanitarian Accountability Report (HAR) for the fourth year running contains an annual overview of the developments in humanitarian accountability by the highly regarded researcher John Borton.
http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/2011har.pdf

Report: The Global Action Report On Preterm Birth

The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth features the first-ever estimates of preterm birth rates by country and is authored by a broad group of 45 international multi-disciplinary experts from 11 countries, with almost 50 organizations in support. This report is written in support of all families who have been touched by preterm birth. This report is written in support of the Global Strategy for Women’s and Children’s Health and the efforts of Every Woman Every Child, led by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon............

https://docs.google.com/file/d/1MyAT864-rVEX_W3Fy1HGvFnYArMzI6SeIqsoLg84H6uhhbxlP4ILJ61pJmEz/edit?pli=1

 
UAH is devoted to matters of interest to Ugandans and Africans in general. Individuals are responsible for whatever they post on this forum.Follow UAH on Twitter at:http://twitter.com/#!/UAHFORUM. Follow UAH on facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ugandans-At-HeartUAH/132196106801171. To donate to UAH activities, click on:http://ugandansatheart.org/donate-to-uah/. Buy our products at: http://ugandansatheart.org/products-to-buy/. Also visit UAH extension at: http://jjanguonkwekule.blogspot.com/.Join UAH facebook group at: https://www.facebook.com/groups/ugandansatheart