UNESCO: Obiang Prize Suspended Again
At a meeting of the 58-member board of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the government delegations decided to continue the suspension of the $3 million UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences and to form a committee to try to reach consensus on a way forward. African countries on the board had attempted to resurrect the stalled prize at Equatorial Guinea’s request. The issue is now due to be decided at the board’s next meeting, in spring 2012.
“Concerned diplomats prevented this latest effort to grant President Obiang the undeserved distinction of an international prize in his name,” said Tutu Alicante, executive director of the nongovernmental group EG Justice and an exile of Equatorial Guinea. “But the UNESCO Board needs to end this debate once and for all by rejecting this prize outright. UNESCO delegates should not let themselves be bullied into backing a public relations campaign by President Obiang.”
The groups calling for the prize’s cancelation, in addition to EG Justice, are Association SHERPA, Committee to Protect Journalists, Global Witness, Human Rights Watch, and Open Society Justice Initiative.
The prize was created by a decision of the board in October 2008 but has never been awarded. In the wake of a global campaign against the prize, in June 2010 the director-general of UNESCO, Irina Bokova, asked the organization’s board to take up the matter again. She expressed her “alarm and anxiety” at the grave risk awarding such a prize would pose to UNESCO’s reputation. UNESCO’s mission includes the promotion of human rights and press freedom. In October 2010, the executive board suspended the prize indefinitely, citing a lack of consensus.
Obiang nevertheless has pushed vigorously to reinstate the prize. A May 2011 effort by the government of Equatorial Guinea to proceed with the award did not make it onto the agenda of the following board meeting. But Obiang had hoped to prevail this time with the nominal support of African countries represented on UNESCO’s board. Obiang secured a resolution in favor of the UNESCO prize at an African Union summit in June 2011, which he hosted in Malabo as that organization’s rotating chair.
Yet opposition to the prize surged from governments, civil society, and leading public figures. In just the past week alone, human rights groups issued a statement opposing the prize, free-expression groups sent a letter to Bokova, and several groups called on the board to refrain from taking any action on the prize until questions about the suspicious nature of the prize’s funding could be resolved.
On September 30, UNESCO director-general Bokova called on delegations to resolve the heated controversy and warned that proceeding with the prize could put the organization at “war against the scientific community.”
“The stakes are very high here,” she was quoted as saying by the Associated Press. “I believe that sometimes we have to take courageous decisions.”
Bokova also appealed to Obiang to withdraw the prize. In a statement on October 3, the government of Equatorial Guinea said that it would continue to press for the UNESCO-Obiang award to be issued.
On October 3, 36 prominent scientists, authors, journalists, and other public figures made an additional appeal to UNESCO not to honor Obiang, now Africa’s longest-serving ruler. The signatories, who include the Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu, Nobel Literature Prize Laureate Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio, the celebrated Nigerian author Chinua Achebe, and the poet and former ambassador from Mexico to UNESCO Homero Aridjis, said in the letter that they were “deeply troubled by the well-documented record of human rights abuse, repression of press freedom, and official corruption that have marked [Obiang’s] rule.” The signatories also called for the prize to be cancelled permanently.
Obiang suffered two other setbacks in the past week in Paris. The police seized 11 of his eldest son’s luxury cars outside Obiang’s posh residence on Avenue Foch as part of an ongoing criminal investigation into properties Obiang and his family and close associates hold.
Separately, a French court ruled against Obiang’s claims of defamation against the French nongovernmental organization CCFD-Terre Solidaire for a 2009 report it published that detailed the ill-gotten gains of public officials, including Obiang. In its decision in the defamation case, the court said that, “A politician of the highest level, and particularly a head of state, must learn to suffer criticism.”
“UNESCO made a major mistake in 2008 when it first agreed to this prize,” Alicante said. “Now that the organization has been put on notice about Obiang’s record of misrule, it would be unthinkable for the organization to proceed with this award, especially in light of recent events, and especially given that President Obiang’s Paris estate is at the center of a major French anticorruption inquiry.”
The civil society organizations call on UNESCO to halt any action that would make use of the funding for the prize, given ongoing criminal investigations in France and Spain, until it can provide credible assurances that the funds are not tainted by corruption. They also urge UNESCO to establish rigorous prize and donation policies to provide for thorough review of all past and future prizes.
Equatorial Guinea Seeks to Resurrect UNESCO-Obiang Science Award
(New York) – The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization should reject a new bid to honor Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, the president of Equatorial Guinea and now Africa's longest serving ruler, with a prize in his name, a group of nine human rights organizations said today.
The executive board of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), which is meeting in Paris until October 6, 2011, will consider a proposal for a $3 million UNESCO life sciences prize, to be funded by the “Obiang Nguema Mbasogo Foundation for the Preservation of Life.” The prize was suspended last year after an outcry from concerned Equatoguineans, human rights groups, anti-corruption campaigners, and prominent literary, scientific, and cultural figures.
An effort by the Obiang government to reinstate the prize in May failed to make it onto the agenda. But the current initiative has the nominal support of other African countries following an African Union (AU) resolution at its summit meeting in Equatorial Guinea in July, which Obiang hosted as this year’s AU chairman.
“UNESCO should not honor President Obiang,” said Tutu Alicante, executive director of EG Justice, an organization based in Washington, DC. “If he wishes to fund science and education around the world, he should start with his own country, where many still lack basic services such as electricity and clean water, while the president and his family flaunt an extravagant lifestyle that is the subject of legal investigations around the world.”
According to evidence produced in 2004 and 2010 investigations by the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Obiang and close family members have diverted tens of millions of dollars from their country's natural resource earnings to their private benefit.
The executive board of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), which is meeting in Paris until October 6, 2011, will consider a proposal for a $3 million UNESCO life sciences prize, to be funded by the “Obiang Nguema Mbasogo Foundation for the Preservation of Life.” The prize was suspended last year after an outcry from concerned Equatoguineans, human rights groups, anti-corruption campaigners, and prominent literary, scientific, and cultural figures.
An effort by the Obiang government to reinstate the prize in May failed to make it onto the agenda. But the current initiative has the nominal support of other African countries following an African Union (AU) resolution at its summit meeting in Equatorial Guinea in July, which Obiang hosted as this year’s AU chairman.
“UNESCO should not honor President Obiang,” said Tutu Alicante, executive director of EG Justice, an organization based in Washington, DC. “If he wishes to fund science and education around the world, he should start with his own country, where many still lack basic services such as electricity and clean water, while the president and his family flaunt an extravagant lifestyle that is the subject of legal investigations around the world.”
According to evidence produced in 2004 and 2010 investigations by the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Obiang and close family members have diverted tens of millions of dollars from their country's natural resource earnings to their private benefit.
The 2010 US State Department human rights report decried “official corruption at all levels of government” and noted that “[t]he president and members of his inner circle continued to amass personal profits from the oil windfall.” Equatorial Guinea is consistently ranked among the most corrupt countries on the globe by Transparency International.
The $3 million UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences was set up in 2008 but has never been awarded. Implementation of the prize was frozen pending further discussion in June 2010. In October, the UNESCO executive board voted to suspend it until a consensus on the matter could be reached by member states.
That action came about after prominent African figures, Latin American writers, Nobel laureates, scientists and public health professionals, press freedom groups, Cano prize winners, and rights organizations from around the world came together in an unprecedented effort to challenge the prize, citing serious concerns about Obiang’s record of corruption and abuse.
Public figures involved in the campaign against the prize have included: Nobel laureates Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu, Wole Soyinka, Mario Vargas Llosa, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, and John Polanyi; author Chinua Achebe; human rights advocate Graça Machel; and over 60 professionals from Equatorial Guinea.
Critics of the prize have highlighted the contrast between the mandate of UNESCO to promote human rights along with its work to defend free expression, and the record of severe repression and official corruption that have marked Obiang’s 32-year rule. Severe restrictions on press freedom, together with self-censorship, make it difficult for citizens of Equatorial Guinea to challenge the government from inside the country over sensitive topics such as ongoing foreign investigations into the alleged corruption of Obiang and his close associates. The government has been repeatedly condemned by UN and other human rights monitors for its systematic use of torture. Recent elections have been criticized as neither free nor fair.
Oil and gas exploitation has made Equatorial Guinea the wealthiest country in sub-Saharan Africa in per capita income, yet the International Monetary Fund and others have expressed concern that government spending on social needs is low in light of its high levels of poverty. According to an analysis by the Economist Intelligence Unit, Equatorial Guinea spends less on education as a percentage of GDP than neighboring countries such as Cameroon and Gabon.
In August 2010 Obiang's government shocked the world when it executed four dissident exiles within an hour after a summary military proceeding found them guilty of treason and attempted assassination.
The nine organizations that are calling for the prize to be revoked are:
The $3 million UNESCO-Obiang Nguema Mbasogo International Prize for Research in the Life Sciences was set up in 2008 but has never been awarded. Implementation of the prize was frozen pending further discussion in June 2010. In October, the UNESCO executive board voted to suspend it until a consensus on the matter could be reached by member states.
That action came about after prominent African figures, Latin American writers, Nobel laureates, scientists and public health professionals, press freedom groups, Cano prize winners, and rights organizations from around the world came together in an unprecedented effort to challenge the prize, citing serious concerns about Obiang’s record of corruption and abuse.
Public figures involved in the campaign against the prize have included: Nobel laureates Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu, Wole Soyinka, Mario Vargas Llosa, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, and John Polanyi; author Chinua Achebe; human rights advocate Graça Machel; and over 60 professionals from Equatorial Guinea.
Critics of the prize have highlighted the contrast between the mandate of UNESCO to promote human rights along with its work to defend free expression, and the record of severe repression and official corruption that have marked Obiang’s 32-year rule. Severe restrictions on press freedom, together with self-censorship, make it difficult for citizens of Equatorial Guinea to challenge the government from inside the country over sensitive topics such as ongoing foreign investigations into the alleged corruption of Obiang and his close associates. The government has been repeatedly condemned by UN and other human rights monitors for its systematic use of torture. Recent elections have been criticized as neither free nor fair.
Oil and gas exploitation has made Equatorial Guinea the wealthiest country in sub-Saharan Africa in per capita income, yet the International Monetary Fund and others have expressed concern that government spending on social needs is low in light of its high levels of poverty. According to an analysis by the Economist Intelligence Unit, Equatorial Guinea spends less on education as a percentage of GDP than neighboring countries such as Cameroon and Gabon.
In August 2010 Obiang's government shocked the world when it executed four dissident exiles within an hour after a summary military proceeding found them guilty of treason and attempted assassination.
The nine organizations that are calling for the prize to be revoked are:
Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos de España
Association Sherpa
Center for Economic and Social Rights
Committee to Protect journalists
EG Justice
Global Witness
Human Rights Watch
Media Legal Defence Initiative
Open Society Justice Initiative
No comments:
Post a Comment